YES

60

LT hell... (4 days ago) said:

yeah!

US yes (3 months ago) said:

they can hold aggro muchbetter

FR j (3 months ago) said:

joippoubpoi

CN ZHOuliang (3 months ago) said:

i want to stand the front to protect my group and i love warrior even without reason.

NZ Yes (3 months ago) said:

that sucks

AU Why (3 months ago) said:

was the thread on the wow forums deleted, i never knew there was a rule against polls and I can't find anything about it in the stickies

US Dinner (3 months ago) said:

Paladins just pwn.

US Hitler T Hawkins (3 months ago) said:

Pl8 Healz as well

US Ellwindrae (3 months ago) said:

I like warriors cause they provide better tanking imo. While a pally can spam 1 button and keep agro the % of good pally tanks to the % of good warrior tanks is crazy.

US breaklance (3 months ago) said:

i vote me

CA Jess (3 months ago) said:

Well geared paladins can aoe tank everything, but theres not many of them around. Poorly geared warriors do better then poorly geared paladins.

NZ tank (3 months ago) said:

We are the kinf of tanking...

AU robyn (3 months ago) said:

no need for cc with a pally tanking

BE Tijgetje (3 months ago) said:

Warrior > Paladin

US WarriorsRapePallies (3 months ago) said:

Warriors will always be the only end-game tanks.

SE Ockeb (3 months ago) said:

no

US Jon (3 months ago) said:

paladins > warriors

US Jpahna (3 months ago) said:

PANTSDI!

US Turo (3 months ago) said:

Rawrr

CA Spiral (3 months ago) said:

AoE tanking is easy on a warrior if the dps focus fires. Paladins are good at compensating for newbs though.

US Pallytanksrscrubs (3 months ago) said:

wars wrere the original mts

US Pallytanksrscrubs (3 months ago) said:

wars wrere the original mts

US Pallytanksrscrubs (3 months ago) said:

wars wrere the original mts

US Pallytanksrscrubs (3 months ago) said:

wars wrere the original mts

NZ Tanker (3 months ago) said:

We are the TRUE tank!

US Scott (3 months ago) said:

Hi we're the warrior tanks. We've been around since day 1, not some flavor of the month 3 button pushing retard who calls that tanking.

US Procyon (3 months ago) said:

duh

US Jastiavan (3 months ago) said:

AOE is good for dps but for a healer, it makes them harder to heal. So warriors when this one.

US Stolos (3 months ago) said:

PALLY TANKS NEED SPEEERIT FOR TO KEEP HEAL, NOT MAKE THREAT

US muulan (3 months ago) said:

the devs will always keep warriors as MT. Forget about it you pally and ferals. Just roll a warrior

NZ iranman (3 months ago) said:

we are the high end tank, pally is for sissy!

US chocoz (3 months ago) said:

I like tanks that have any hope of matching my threat... so warriors all the way.

AU Torka (3 months ago) said:

I prefer droids!

US bob (3 months ago) said:

WARRIORS

US Darkbird (3 months ago) said:

For 5mans paladins..... But for ANY raid warriors kick ass... and who cares about 5mans anymore anyway.

US rawr (3 months ago) said:

Wars > pallys

US akiane (3 months ago) said:

Trapping can be a pain with tankadins, and I seem to have better experiences with prot warrs in general

US Shizt (3 months ago) said:

Pallys should be healing.

US Morm (3 months ago) said:

Warrior Tank. Pally Tanks have it way too easy. They need to learn how to tank with the Big Dogs..

CA kisso (3 months ago) said:

I prefer warrior . But pally are better in 5man cuz of their AoE.

US Boramir (3 months ago) said:

Depends on the paladin, if they vastly outgear the instance it's fine, otherwise, gimme a warrior...also, lol blueragebar

US MDM (3 months ago) said:

There's a reason a warrior has been the tank for every world first since Lucifron.

SE Ryck (3 months ago) said:

Ryck

US holynight (3 months ago) said:

I am a holy paladin. and I prefer warriors over prot paladins any day. it is what I am use to being a pre bc raider.

GB Moniar (3 months ago) said:

Warrior, but I am one, so I'm biased. Paladins encourage lazy dps play, which makes the dps liabilities in 25 mans where they have to do more than put down as much damage as possible.

NZ fuckpallys (3 months ago) said:

pick up a mace and heal you fucks

US Haftonburger (3 months ago) said:

I have both, but I prefer to play the warrior. Pally tanking almost feels like cheating by comparison, but it's also 10x more boring to play.

PH generoso (3 months ago) said:

Warrior tanks have more hp, more avoidance, more block and infinite rage. Pally tanks tank trash and nonheroics. stick to healing!

US Haasum (3 months ago) said:

I am a warrior tank and I enjoy it very much. Paladin tanking is just so idiot proof. Warriors generally need to be better at their class then a paladin to tank, and yes I have one of both.

US Poe (3 months ago) said:

Stick to healing.

NZ From WOW forum (3 months ago) said:

However, I feel any of the 3 classes are good in certain situations, and all 3 should be included by the guild.

NZ MySoul (3 months ago) said:

I am the main tank of my guild, I think we both good, however, in some cases, we are still better then pally, lol.

US Skreek (3 months ago) said:

I'm just old fasioned I guess, but I find it easier to keep up skilled warriors, whereas I do not find as many skilled paladins. Warriors also have a lot more 'tricks' to keep themselves alive.

AU Name (3 months ago) said:

Comment (Prot paladins don't last long)

US Viruz (3 months ago) said:

Prot Pally FTW

NZ Yifan (3 months ago) said:

I am a pally, I vote for Pally, I love pally, warrior fuck off!

AU Alfonsoe (3 months ago) said:

They take less damage and aren't as cheesy. Just need some competent ret pallies for blessings.

NZ Furpal (3 months ago) said:

It's very situational, for non-intense shit a druid would take the cake everytime

PH da (3 months ago) said:

wad

CA zebong (3 months ago) said:

No comparison. I'd take a feral druid over a paladin too

1: Check the question, 2: Think about it, 3: Vote for it
Security Image
(generate new image)
contact

Project Which
Public Beta v0.1.5 (20080430)

contact

©2008 Alan + Tony

121

NO

NZ xiao guang tou (12 days ago) said:

xfgkjk

NZ xiao guang tou (12 days ago) said:

xfgkjk

AU xyther (23 days ago) said:

aoe tanking ftw

AU Klarissa (24 days ago) said:

A paladin always holds more agro when im unspeced for improved threat reduction but warries just cant putup with it

AU balls (about 1 month ago) said:

Neither, druids own

PH moralfag (about 1 month ago) said:

because warriors are suited for killing. paladins can't do shit xcept heal and shield up because they are lawful good. lol

US Kira (about 1 month ago) said:

paladins FWT

US Zarintaj (about 1 month ago) said:

As a mage, I prefer the paladin. AOE tanking ftw.

US Zeplar (2 months ago) said:

Paladins seem better for AoE tanking definitely, and equal at single-target tanking, plus they ca rez.

US Cureaga (2 months ago) said:

Paladins can be more lax in what classes they bring along. CC and whatnot isn't as important. I would take a good tank of any class before a bad one though so it's a moot point.

US Drepeen (3 months ago) said:

Pally aoe tanking is ftw. As a healer, it sucks when they are badly geared and still want to aoe tank. Either way it really depends on the situation.

AU Wasa (3 months ago) said:

Pally > War.

US Myschla (3 months ago) said:

different strokes for different folks

US Drazak (3 months ago) said:

I voted no assuming the question meant do I prefer a warrior over a pally. For 5-mans I much prefer a pally as there is little need for CC.

US Floura (3 months ago) said:

Paladins are great in general for 5 mans. In 10 mans, they're okay, and 25 mans are amazing for any AoE pull. As a non-AoE class though, they don't truly help me much.

US Crea[er (3 months ago) said:

Pally Tanks are rarer to find, but much better imo for most things. Warriors are better for boss fights though, but pallies outwiegh them here :D

US Kaisendou (3 months ago) said:

1500dps in Mt. Hyjal. Nuff Said.

CA Chainfury (3 months ago) said:

In a raid it's a good thing to have both. They're both good at different things.

US spectrum (3 months ago) said:

Pallies can tank anything a warrior can, barring gimmicky fights. They also make things faster with their ability to tank many mobs at once and do decent AE DPS.

US Arms Warrior (3 months ago) said:

Pali's are, "idiot proof."

GB Skotera (3 months ago) said:

Warriors are boring

AU Someyoungdruid (3 months ago) said:

Pallies are retard friendly

US Ar (3 months ago) said:

Paladins ftw... don't have to worry about waiting for them to get aggro on everything.

US drood (3 months ago) said:

droods pwn all

PL benn (3 months ago) said:

palas - best 5man tanks imo :)

US Frosty the Snowman (3 months ago) said:

Pallies ftw

US Frosty the Snowman (3 months ago) said:

Pallies ftw

US Scott-DRUID (3 months ago) said:

I'd rather tank, but if it is the choice between a Warrior and a Paladin, the Paladin wins, hands down.

SE biff (3 months ago) said:

pally tanks > all

GB Beans (3 months ago) said:

Beans

US Kaliedoscope (3 months ago) said:

Pally, I am one.

US Kaliedoscope (3 months ago) said:

Pally, I am one.

US Makleod (3 months ago) said:

Really depends entirely on situation. For a 5 man pally hands down, for 10 man doesn't mater too much. For 25 warrior easily. Assuming same skill/gear level

DE Wrinch (3 months ago) said:

Pally

US notagain (3 months ago) said:

pally tanking is more fun

BG Rozamar (3 months ago) said:

pallys do more thread and can survive longer, only thing a warr has is SW thats with big CD...

US War (3 months ago) said:

Im a war, but when i play my priest I was a paladin

US Michaelin (3 months ago) said:

I AM TANKADIN!!

US Telemon (3 months ago) said:

I'm a Tankadin so I'm biased. I Think were more versatile. And to those who say wars are for raids, pallies are downing illidan every day.

US Freakyfresh (3 months ago) said:

As for MTing I prefer warriors.

US ab (3 months ago) said:

paly

US Xsv (3 months ago) said:

druid / pally ftw. prot warriors are gimp.

US mike (3 months ago) said:

pally tank

US Undercooked (3 months ago) said:

lolwarriors

CA Raynie (3 months ago) said:

pally ftw

US Xatros (3 months ago) said:

This is confusing... this isn't a yes or no question. But yeah, pallies are better tanks.

US bit (3 months ago) said:

Why make it hard on yourself with a warrior? Too many opportunities for them to fuck up.

CA T (3 months ago) said:

Give me a druid tank any day of the week.

NZ tan (3 months ago) said:

there is no way warrior can win this poll! pally ftw

US LimaBeans (3 months ago) said:

Paladins are just insane at the moment.. No reason to pick a war.

US lol@warriors (3 months ago) said:

Lol@ any tank class without AE threat. Stop wasting your time and reroll.

US Necro (3 months ago) said:

I like pally tanks (unless a druid's available); Not as much CC needed letting me AoE a bit more. I think there's cases where each tank excel, but I like pallys over wars most of the time.

US Executis (3 months ago) said:

I am a pally tank

CA jj (3 months ago) said:

PALLYFTW

NO arcus (3 months ago) said:

none

US Atervir (3 months ago) said:

I'm a pally and I spec prot when I need to get things done.

US kyle (3 months ago) said:

salvation is a huge factor in this decision.

US Carrot (3 months ago) said:

Actually prefer neither (unless I'm tanking ^_^). I've worked with good warriors, pallies and druid tanks and would take any of 'em.

US fahsky (3 months ago) said:

Haha, CC, what CC? We don't need CC. XD We're DPS & tank rolled into one.

AU Drunken_Haze (3 months ago) said:

I prefer pallys for large pulls but other than that I don't care so long as they threat good so we can dps hard

US Thalion (3 months ago) said:

On large pulls, as a healer, don't have to worry about getting heal aggro when the warrior can't keep up threat on all the targets.

HK Zolderan (3 months ago) said:

Pally tanks are just so OP, they have buffs + kik ass AoE aggro

CA allen (3 months ago) said:

warriors make everything slow in heroics/kara but for 25 mans definatly warriors

US seal of PWN (3 months ago) said:

I have a warrior tank and a pally tank. Pallys are by far better , more fun to tank, and bring more to the raid than a warrior. sorry go respec and do arena

GB kyle (3 months ago) said:

kkkvjvfgsfdghfhtfghydghndthjj

US lillendal (3 months ago) said:

prot pally owns 5-man and kara, undead.but i've found that prot pallies cant keep mana well with a pally healer. need a druid for HOTS.

AU Bryn (3 months ago) said:

Paladins are better for 5 mans and 10 mans. Warriors are better for 25 man bosses.

AU ferreri (3 months ago) said:

BC gave me the tanks wow needed

US Barbacoa (3 months ago) said:

cookies

US HearthVaderr! (3 months ago) said:

Prot Pally FTW

US Tankadin (3 months ago) said:

Pally ftw

US BIGHAIRYSHAFT (3 months ago) said:

I LIK PANKAKES

US Kugatsu (3 months ago) said:

As long as they can tank, I don't really care what class they are.

US Justify (3 months ago) said:

I prefer prot paladins. When you have a prot pally in a heroic or 10 man, things go so smooth and it doesn't matter if a cc breaks.

AU Crokke (3 months ago) said:

tankadin!

US Renaldo (3 months ago) said:

They can both handle any content, but pally tanks seem to make runs go smoother.

AU Spamstringsucks (3 months ago) said:

go pally wars are for arms

NZ Draell (3 months ago) said:

Pally win

AU Ducan (3 months ago) said:

I'm a fury warrior, so the more whirlwinds I can do, the better

US Avias (3 months ago) said:

Tankadins FTW

US Verygreen (3 months ago) said:

I prefer prot pally for 5 mans and raids. They can rez, prevent wipes, buff and tank 20+ mobs without even trying.

US Olak (3 months ago) said:

Pally ftw

AU David (3 months ago) said:

Pallys Rock

US Maryle (3 months ago) said:

I'd never take a Warrior over a Paladin.

US Aedran (3 months ago) said:

I <3 my prot pallies!

US Scrublol (3 months ago) said:

It actually really depends. AOE tanking /5 mans? I'll take a prot pally over a warrior anyday. But I've always had better luck with prot pallys than warriors.

AU Martin (3 months ago) said:

Feel the paladin love

NZ LooOO (3 months ago) said:

Paladin has lots of good AOE threat control, Pally FTW FTW FTW!

US halp (3 months ago) said:

Prot pally hooooooo

US Lilliam (3 months ago) said:

Sorry, consecrate ftw

US Lilliam (3 months ago) said:

Sorry, consecrate ftw

AP Shepardshadows (3 months ago) said:

Paladins are superior, from sheer versatility. Raid wide buffs. Bubble, judgments, shield block that blocks 4 attacks against dual weidling bosses, lowering the chance to be crushed.

US Bubblebetuna (3 months ago) said:

1. Avenger's shield 2. ?????? 3. Loot

NZ lunous (3 months ago) said:

Sorry Warrior, Pally have my vote this time.

CA Cavalleras (3 months ago) said:

I have a paladin tank, and i have a warrior who used to tank. So far the paladin tank is much easier on stupid groups.

CA Annora (3 months ago) said:

I much prefer prot paladins for 5 and 10 man instances. However, bears and warriors make great boss tanks in 25 mans.

US Abrila (3 months ago) said:

Paladin tanks are great.

CA mm (3 months ago) said:

yue

US Kelryn (3 months ago) said:

I like prot paladins.

US Ole One Eye (3 months ago) said:

Tankadin ftw.

CA vyaine (3 months ago) said:

tankadin all the way, ive tanked as a warrior pre 60 up to the first few bosses in naxx. and i have to say that i love tanking as a pally soooo much better.

US enthused (3 months ago) said:

tankadin all the way

CA Pasa (3 months ago) said:

I adore my pally tanks. They make instances both easy and fun.

US desert (3 months ago) said:

paladin is easier for healers and faster

US Jo (3 months ago) said:

Pallys can't tank!!! Oh wait...complain, complain, complain... good to go now!

NZ From WOW forum (3 months ago) said:

My general preference for 5-man: 1. Pally 2. Bear 3. Warrior

NZ From WOW forum (3 months ago) said:

I like all 3 classes tanking, though as a prot pally myself, obviously I have some bias.

US Jess (3 months ago) said:

As a healer, I prefer a pally tank.

US Truewanderer (3 months ago) said:

I like the Pallys, AOE and blessings/aura's for party!

CA Valcarde (3 months ago) said:

Paladin tank FTW. From frontloaded threat, to blessings, to scaling threat, to more consistent uncrushable...

NZ Raijin (3 months ago) said:

Pally <3 can hold more aoe agro when im spamming SoC :D

US sahsher (3 months ago) said:

I would take a Druid over a Paladin though. Since I have both that have tanked. :)

DE Saberwood (3 months ago) said:

Paladins > Warriors, that is all

NZ Bow (3 months ago) said:

Pally FTW! Indeed!

AU Keylogger (3 months ago) said:

I'm pretty good at this stuff, check google if you don't believe me

US Mike (3 months ago) said:

<3 my Pallies

US Andrew (3 months ago) said:

Pally tanks > any other in almost every circumstance. Threat generated scales best with gear compared to other tanking classes.

US Andrew (3 months ago) said:

Pally tanks > any other in almost every circumstance. Threat generated scales best with gear compared to other tanking classes.

NZ Ret (3 months ago) said:

I am a mage, I prefer pally!

US Lolwut (3 months ago) said:

.

US Lea (3 months ago) said:

Perfer to play Druid then War then pally. But if I had to have someone else tank, I'd want the pally before the war.